| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

View
 

Defining Plagiarism

Page history last edited by PBworks 12 years, 8 months ago

 

Faculty Resources > Understanding Plagiarism

 

 

 STRUCTURE

 

This resource page is divided into two parts:
1) Overview of topic.
2) Select list of annotated resources for more in-depth coverage of this topic.

If you know of additional material to include, please feel free to add or edit.  Keep in mind that we are more interested in providing annotated links to the best resources on a topic rather than a long list of resources of various quality and coverage.  All links should lead to freely accessible resource material unless otherwise indicated.

Understanding Plagiarism

 

GW is an academic community that respects the work and ideas of others.  In the academic world, words and ideas are protected by rules and regulations that an institution adopts.  At GW, these rules are presented in the GW Code of Academic Integrity  which defines plagiarism as:

 

Intentionally representing the words, ideas, or sequence of ideas of another as one's own in any academic exercise; failure to attribute any of the following: quotations, paraphrases, or borrowed information.

 

 This is the scope of responsible writing and research that the GW academic community adopted in AY 96-97.  Though the definition does not provide a laundry list of modes of communication such as audio, video, images, etc.,  the use of the word “ideas” functions as an umbrella term for today's multi-modal communication platforms.

 

Even though plagiarism is not a law--more of an academic construction of appropriate professional behavior--much of the ideas adopted in academia about plagiarism derive from the constitutial statute of copyright.  Moreover, the concepts that formulate plagiarism and copyright law itself come out of Western cultural concepts of intellectual property.  Consequently, nonwestern scholars often do not understand plagiarism as the foundation of intellectual property rights is not part of their culture.  For more on English as a Second Language issues concerning plagiarism, see Cultural Issues and Plagiarism

 

 

Types of Plagiarism:  Intentional and Accidental Plagiarism

 

Plagiarism is can be divided into two types: intentional and accidental.   

 

Intentional plagiarism is when a person knowingly and willfully presents someone else’s work as his/her own.  Robert Harris, in his article “Anti-Plagiarism Strategies for Research Papers” identifies seven types of intentional plagiarism:

 

  1. Downloading a free paper from the Internet and turning the paper in as one’s own work
  2. Purchasing a paper from a commercial paper mill and turning the paper in as one’s own work
  3. Copying an article from the web and turning the entire article in as one’s own work
  4. Using a paper written by another student and turning it in as one’s own work
  5. Cutting and pasting content in a paper and presenting the content as one’s own
  6. Misrepresenting direct quotations
  7. Faking a citation

 

Intentional plagiarism is often detected when an instructor notices an inconsistency in the writing such as a change in style, content, or vocabulary.  Other times an instructor might suspect plagiarism because something about the content seems familiar to the instructor producing a feeling of “I’ve read that before.”

 

Accidental plagiarism, on the other hand, is when a person does not understand how to properly quote, paraphrase, summarize, or cite resulting in the content being unintentionally attributed to the compiler and not the original author. The Council of Writing Program Administrator’s (WPA) in “Defining and Avoiding Plagiarism: The WPA statement on Best Practices”  identifies reasons for this unintentional form of plagiarism:

 

  • Not knowing how to take careful notes

  • Not knowing how to integrate sources

  • Not knowing how to compile a bibliography

  • Confusion due to inconsistent definitions of plagiarism by faculty

  • Confusion due to a foreign student’s unfamiliarity with American conventions of academic attribution.

  • Contextual confusion caused by switching from a business or organizational environment where it is acceptable to use other’s words and the academic environment where it is not without proper attribution. (2-3)

 

 

 Resources on Defining Plagiarism

 

Written to prepare faculty to face issues of plagiarism with paper assignments, the article provides insight and advice from three perspectives:  1)  why and how students plagiarize, 2) strategies to prevent plagiarism from explaining plagiarism to redesigning assignments, and 3) tools and techniques for detecting plagiarism.  Harris expanded this article into the 2001 book The Plagiarism Handbook (ISBN: 1884585353).

 

 

An all inclusive guide for faculty on how to detect and prevent plagiarism. The bulk of the guide is divided into two strategies for preventing plagiarism.  The first strategy involves educating students about plagiarism through in-class discussions about plagiarism, its causes, forms and consequences as well as teaching proper conventions of academic attribution.  The second strategy is by addressing how to make “plagiarism-proof” assignments both in writing and presenting the assignment. Colorado State University’s Online Writing Studio is a leader in online writing centers and its content is always well developed and designed.

 

 

This document explores how and why students plagiarize and then offers a series of teaching strategies faculty can adopt to prevent plagiarism.  These include educating students about academic plagiarism and its consequences, how to design and sequence plagiarism-proof assignments, teach proper citation, and take disciplinary action when necessary.

 

 

 Resources on Copyright

 

This is the web site of the U.S. Copyright Office. The site has an excellent Copyright Basics  section that defines copyright, describes what it covers, explains who can apply, and even discusses international concerns.

 

The site describes itself as offering “general copyright information for educators, students, websurfers and confused citizens.”  Divided into five sections, the site addresses the major domains of copyright.  The Info section gives an overview of copyright issues including fair use and public domain, as well as giving an overall  history of copyright law.  For teaching purposes, the site includes PowerPoint presentations on copyright issues. The Movies section looks at the scope of copyright in the visual domain of movies, television shows, photographs and artwork.  The Music section focuses on the audio domain and deals with all aspects of music composition and delivery.  The Web section examines copyright in the digital domain concerning software and the web.  The final section is an online wizard that aids in copyright registration.

 

This brochure was developed to by the Association of Research Libraries to provide faculty with a quick resource on copyright law and practice. The brochure is downloadable in several formats and emphasizes linking instead of copying, a strategy in line with a Web 2.0 perspective.

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.